Trump Demands Judge Drop Lawsuit Blocking White House DronePort


Follow America's fastest-growing news aggregator, Spreely News, and stay informed. You can find all of our articles plus information from your favorite Conservative voices. 

President Donald Trump is pushing back hard against a court injunction that has stalled construction of a new White House ballroom with an attached drone port, calling the lawsuit a dangerous interference with national security while the Justice Department urges the judge to lift the block after a recent shooting near the executive mansion. The dispute pits presidential authority and modern security needs against preservation claims from a long-running preservation group and an individual plaintiff, and it has become a flashpoint in debates over who decides how the White House is defended.

Trump blasted the legal challenge on social media, insisting the project is essential to protect Washington. “The DronePort at the White House Ballroom will be, perhaps, the most sophisticated anywhere in the World!” Trump wrote Sunday on Truth Social. “It will safeguard our Nation’s Capital, Washington, D.C., long into the future.

“Judge Richard Leon should stop playing games with America’s Security!” Trump wrote, urging an immediate dismissal of the suit and finger-pointing at the judge for allowing the case to proceed. He warned of consequences in stark terms: “If anything happens, he will be held responsible for the Death and Destruction caused to our Country,” Trump added.

Trump also accused the litigation of exposing sensitive material and wasting time on a plaintiff he labels frivolous, arguing the lawsuit has already done damage. “He has already created enough problems by allowing ‘Top Secret’ information to be released and exposed based on a ridiculous lawsuit started by a highly litigious woman (serial plaintiff!) whose ‘strolling,’ in her opinion, will be disturbed by the new, desperately needed structure – In any event, a woman who has absolutely no STANDING!

“With the advent of highly sophisticated, and powerful, modern day weaponry, we can no longer defend Washington, D.C., with rifles and pistols, alone. This ridiculous lawsuit must be dismissed, IMMEDIATELY!” Trump added, framing the issue as one of survival and clear authority. That hard line mirrors the Justice Department filing asking the court to remove the injunction and let critical security work proceed.

In a blunt filing, the acting attorney general argued the injunction is untenable in the current security environment and must be vacated. “In light of the recent attacks against President Trump’s life — including two attempts in less than a month — the injunction entered by this Court for the benefit of a strolling woman, who filed suit against the East Wing Project long before she knew what was going to be built (This is a woman who is a known serial plaintiff throughout Washington, D.C.), and who has absolutely no standing, must be immediately vacated, and this suit, which is a complete embarrassment to our Country, must be dismissed,” acting Attorney General Todd Blanche wrote in the five-page filing.

The Justice Department called the case “a terrible, tremendously harmful case to the United States of America, and all it stands for!” and tied its urgency to recent security incidents. A shooter who opened fire at a White House checkpoint was wounded by officers and later died, an event the government says underlines the gap the ballroom and associated defenses are designed to close.

The legal fight stretches back to an April ruling in which the judge questioned whether the president had authority to build the ballroom without Congress, issuing an injunction that stopped above-ground construction. An appeals court briefly allowed work to continue, but the back-and-forth has left the project in limbo while both sides press their arguments through the courts.

The lawsuit was filed by a historic preservation group and backed by an individual plaintiff who says the project threatens the fabric of the White House complex. The preservation group has said it will pursue the case, insisting its mission is to protect historic federal buildings even as the administration insists security needs must come first.

Trump has repeatedly described the ballroom as a multi-layered defense and major event space, saying the plan includes advanced military features. The project would reportedly include a rooftop drone base and a six-story underground military complex with a hospital and research facilities to support both security and emergency response needs.

“The entire roof is built for military,” Trump said during a tour with reporters. “They have a massive drone capacity. Not only is it drone-proof, if a drone hits it, it bounces off, it won’t have any impact. But it’s also meant as a drone port that would protect all of Washington.”

The administration says the ballroom will be large enough for big gatherings of up to 1,000 people and will include hardened protections like titanium fencing, thick special glass and what Trump called “impenetrable steel” roofing, plus fencing so substantial that “a bulldozer cannot knock it over.” The constitutional and policy clash over the project continues as the judge considers the Justice Department’s latest request to dissolve the injunction.

Share:

GET MORE STORIES LIKE THIS

IN YOUR INBOX!

Sign up for our daily email and get the stories everyone is talking about.

Discover more from Liberty One News

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading