Tom Steyer’s surprise jump into the California governor’s race set off a familiar round of attacks, with Katie Porter blasting him even though she accepted donations from him in prior campaigns. The exchange has drawn accusations of hypocrisy, raised questions about money and influence in Democratic politics, and reignited scrutiny of Porter’s temper and treatment of staff. This piece walks through the donations, the public barbs, reactions from other Democrats, and how the crowded primary looks heading into the contest.
Katie Porter publicly dismissed Steyer’s pitch, calling his entry into the race a sham and declaring, “I call bulls—.” That line landed hard because public records show she took donations from Steyer while running for House and Senate, a fact opponents have used to paint her as inconsistent. Voters watching this will see a familiar political dance: big money enters, candidates point fingers, and the question of credibility becomes central.
Financial filings made that point plain: Porter received more than $16,000 from Steyer across multiple cycles, a detail that undercuts a straightforward attack on his past business ties. Critics seized on that dollar figure to argue Porter’s criticism rings hollow, and the exchange has become a talking point among Democrats and Republicans alike. For a party that wants to sell a message of accountability, optics like these matter.
“Katie Porter is the ultimate hypocrite and all she’s done in this race is step on one rake after another,” a longtime Democratic strategist said of Porter. “This is easily the most disastrous race a Democrat has been running in 2026, which is why Porter is a real liability at the top of the ticket and why Democrats are looking around for alternatives.” That assessment reflects growing nervousness about who can actually carry the top of the ticket in a state where voters are fed up and looking for competence.
TOM STEYER MOUNTS CALIFORNIA GUBERNATORIAL BID, JOINING CROWD OF CANDIDATES JOCKEYING TO SUCCEED NEWSOM
Steyer framed his run as a fight for working families, promising to tackle corporate influence and make life more affordable, while pointing to past fights against fossil fuels and tobacco. His pitch sounds populist, but opponents are quick to note the contradiction between fighting industries and profiting from them. That contradiction is exactly what Porter highlighted, and what other critics will use to chip away at his credibility.
Not everyone in the Democratic primary welcomed Steyer with open arms. “Tom Steyer tried to buy the presidency — and he failed,” Betty Yee said after his announcement. “The California governorship is not going to be his consolation prize.” That blunt take exposes doubts about whether a billionaire with a record of self-funding can translate money into the kind of broad-based support Californians expect from a governor.
Porter’s campaign troubles go beyond campaign cash. She’s been criticized for brusque exchanges with the press and tense interactions with staff, which have circulated widely online and become part of her public story. In a recent TV moment she abruptly walked away after a back-and-forth about whether she needs Trump voters to win, trading terse lines like “How would I need them in order to win, ma’am?” and “I feel like this is unnecessarily argumentative,” with the reporter before ending the interview by saying, “I don’t want to keep doing this, I’m going to call it.” Those clips feed a narrative about temperament and readiness for office.
Porter’s dismissive replies, including “I don’t care,” when pressed on outreach to voters across the aisle, have been amplified by opponents and pundits eager to show a lack of political discipline. Added to viral videos showing tense staff interactions, these moments create a pile-up of concerns about leadership style. In a tough, competitive primary, such perceptions can be decisive.
CALIFORNIA PARENTS CONVICTED OF STABBING, DECAPITATING 2 CHILDREN AND FORCING OTHER KIDS TO SEE BODIES
The Democratic field remains crowded, with big names like Antonio Villaraigosa and Xavier Becerra among those jockeying for position, and lesser-known hopefuls also trying to break through. All of them will have to answer not only policy questions but also how they handle money, messaging, and personnel issues. For Republicans and independents watching, the intra-party scramble is a reminder that political theater often drowns out serious governance talk.
