A common tactic of the left, when they want to go around the American Republic Rule of Law, which is grounded in the US Constitution, is to use nonprofit groups or NGOs to mimic “democracy” and overthrow the will of the people. NGOs are privately funded, often social justice charities, claiming to be the moral and ethical standard-bearers of law and order. Note the use of them in the AZ audit as told in a daily update.
“A group of so-called experts are asking the Justice Department to send federal monitors to Arizona to interfere in our state hand audit/ The two lead actors are the Brennan Center for Justice and the Protect Democracy group. Their names sound innocent of course but both of those groups are major backroom players,” Chairman of the AZ Republican Party, Dr. Kelli Ward, said in her video.
BREAKING NEWS… Major developments threaten America's Audit in Arizona as Democrats ramp up efforts to undermine process. Watch Arizona GOP Chairwoman @kelliwardaz give the latest update. We Will #FinishTheAudit We Will Not Be Intimidated. pic.twitter.com/2dRWvxwdCH
— Arizona Republican Party (@AZGOP) April 30, 2021
WHY THE BRENNAN CENTER? TO GO AROUND A PRIOR SUPREME COURT DECISION TO GIVE STATES THE RIGHT TO DETERMINE THEIR ELECTIONS- LET’S GO DOWN A RABBIT HOLE
The Brennan Center’s Democracy Now is a group of layer activists similar to the Lawyers Guild, who were a part of the George Floyd uprisings. Having nonprofit organizations of social justice warriors acting as lawyers is an oftentimes Marxist tactic, meant for political theater, harassment, intimidation, and chaos, as seen in the story below. But who are they, and who do they represent?
According to their website, The Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law (EIN 13-3839293) is a registered 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization. Contributions to the Brennan Center are tax-deductible to the fullest extent of the law.
THEY REPRESENT THE UNITED NATIONS- THEY ARE FOREIGN AGENTS
According to this document stored at the Brennan Center, the Lawyers Guild is a group that is for the purpose of representing the United Nations ideas of “Human Rights,” yes, the same UN that just appointed Iran the arbiter of Women’s Rights around the globe. The Democrat-led government appears to be forcing Arizona to allow the UN to monitor the hand audit that is underway there.
According to this Document, in Alabama V Eric Holder, Holder makes the case that America is so racist and horrible that we can not be allowed to have our own systems, so we need Non-government agencies (NGO) like Lawyers Guild, and The Brennan Center agrees. See Page 10
In the case referred to above, Alabama wanted part of the 1964 Voting Rights Act changed, and the Supreme Court agreed with them, disregarding the testimony of Eric Holder.
Important to note here that the Lawyers Guild is behind much of the leftward shift for the United States judicial demands that claim America is too racist to have police and too racist to have due process rights, using propaganda and third world tactics to shift public policy in their favor. Consider the UN’s Lawyer Guild partnership with numerous social justice movements, such as Black Lives Matter, meant to bring America into decline. Newsletter.
And still, these groups that represent foreign nations have no jurisdiction, as Ward said in her update video. Yet, they are given unfettered access to our law enforcement and elections by the Democrats.
The Brennan Center even knows that they have no jurisdiction, According to their own site, yet they persist:
“On June 25, 2013, the Supreme Court ruled that the coverage formula in Section 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act — which determines which jurisdictions are covered by Section 5 — is unconstitutional because it is based on an old formula. As a practical matter this means that Section 5 is inoperable until Congress enacts a new coverage formula, which the decision invited Congress to do. The Brennan Center’s statement on the decision is available here.”
SO WHAT IS THE BRENNAN CENTER DOING IN THIS CASE? THEY ARE RELITIGATING ERIC HOLDER’S LOSS AT THE SCOTUS.
In their statement of sadness, the Brennan Center reported on Eric Holder’s loss representing their desires to control state elections with national UN guided mandates and said:
The Supreme Court’s long-awaited ruling on voting rights case Shelby County v. Holder came down today, with the Court invalidating the formula used to determine which states are covered by Section 5 of the Voting Rights.
The Brennan Center for Justice released the following statement from President Michael Waldman:
“The Supreme Court’s decision is at odds with recent history. The Voting Rights Act was vital in 2012, not just 1965. For nearly five decades, it has been the nation’s most effective tool to eradicate racial discrimination in voting. And it is still critical today. Last year, Section 5 helped block laws making it harder to vote. There is a path forward. Section 5 stands. Congress now has the duty to upgrade this key protection and ensure our elections remain free, fair, and accessible for all Americans.”
And so now, hopefully, people can connect the dots to why Democrats are using pandemic emergency powers for massive ballot harvesting schemes, to claim that it is time for new rules over state elections by passing the SCOTUS.
The hand audit in Arizona is a house of cards. And it appears as if the left is about to fall if courts follow the laws.