Trump set to halt California’s comprehensive electric vehicle mandates

Follow America's fastest-growing news aggregator, Spreely News, and stay informed. You can find all of our articles plus information from your favorite Conservative voices. 

President Donald Trump and California Governor Gavin Newsom have recently been at odds over Newsom’s handling of anti-ICE protests in Los Angeles. However, this isn’t the only clash between the White House and California’s policies. Trump is set to deliver a significant blow to Newsom’s environmental plans, targeting the state’s vehicle emissions standards and electric vehicle sales mandate.

As reported by Reuters, Trump is prepared to revoke California’s ability to enforce nationwide vehicle emissions rules. This move will dismantle the state’s mandate for electric vehicle sales, which was supposed to take substantial effect by 2035. The president plans to sign three congressional resolutions to counter California’s ban on gas-powered car sales.

The resolutions aim to repeal a Biden-era waiver from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, which allowed California to enforce stricter emissions standards. This waiver, part of the Clean Air Act, required 80% of new cars to be electric within ten years. Trump’s signature will prevent California from setting stricter emissions standards for passenger cars, commercial trucks, and heavy-duty diesel engines.

The Congressional Review Act, a tool available at the start of a new presidential term, was employed by lawmakers to reverse these Biden-era actions. The deadline was narrowly met to achieve this legislative objective. Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD) argued that the waivers gave California undue influence over national emissions standards.

During the vote, Sen. Elissa Slotkin (D-MI) joined Republicans, citing her duty to protect the Michigan auto industry. Republican Indiana Gov. Mike Braun and Rep. Rudy Yakym (R-IN) expressed their support in a Fox News op-ed. They argued that the Clean Air Act was never meant to give one state control over national emissions standards.

Braun and Yakym emphasized that Congress barred states from setting separate vehicle regulations unless under “compelling and extraordinary conditions” specific to that state. They insisted that national policies should be determined by elected representatives, not unelected regulators or a single state’s agenda. The governor and congressman concluded that ending the EPA-California arrangement would safeguard American jobs and promote innovation.

John Bozzella, CEO of the Alliance for Automotive Innovation, provided a different perspective. He stated that the electric vehicle sales mandates were unrealistic. Meeting these mandates, he said, would require diverting resources away from the EV transition to buy compliance credits from Tesla.

Meanwhile, California Attorney General Rob Bonta vowed to challenge the decision legally. He expressed his commitment to protecting California’s authority to maintain clean vehicle standards. Bonta accused President Trump of playing partisan games with lives and jobs at stake, but as expected, Trump remains resolute.

The outcome has been celebrated by many in the GOP as a victory for states’ rights and economic freedom. They argue that allowing one state to dictate national standards is overreach. This decision is seen as a step towards empowering consumers and manufacturers alike.

Critics of California’s policies argue that they stifle innovation and limit consumer choice. They believe that the market, not government mandates, should drive the shift to electric vehicles. The Trump administration’s actions reflect a commitment to free-market principles and economic growth.

The debate over emissions standards highlights broader tensions between federal and state power. Trump’s move to revoke California’s waiver underscores his administration’s priorities. As always, the political landscape remains dynamic and contentious.

The clash between Trump and Newsom is emblematic of larger ideological divides. While California pushes for aggressive environmental action, the federal government seeks to limit its reach. This ongoing battle will likely continue to shape policy debates in the years to come.

Ultimately, the decision reflects a significant shift in national environmental policy. The implications will be felt by automakers, consumers, and policymakers alike. As debates over emissions and vehicle standards continue, both sides remain steadfast in their convictions.

Share:

GET MORE STORIES LIKE THIS

IN YOUR INBOX!

Sign up for our daily email and get the stories everyone is talking about.

Discover more from Liberty One News

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading