President Trump’s influence over Republican primaries is under fresh scrutiny as South Carolina voters head into a crowded GOP contest for governor. He gave Lt. Gov. Pamela Evette a last-minute endorsement, but local political pride and a controversial nudge about a running mate turned what should have been a straightforward boost into a test of how endorsements land on the ground. The result will matter for the June 23 runoff and for how national figures weigh in on state races going forward.
One week after his streak of primary wins hit a snag, Trump’s clout is being measured again in the Palmetto State. He stepped in late to back Lt. Gov. Pamela Evette as she seeks to succeed term-limited Governor Henry McMaster. That kind of high-profile support usually moves votes, but this time the field and local dynamics make things less predictable.
The primary features several heavy hitters: Attorney General Alan Wilson, Reps. Nancy Mace and Ralph Norman, and businessman Rom Reddy. With no one expected to crack 50 percent, the top two finishers will advance to a runoff on June 23. That runoff will be the real proving ground for anyone claiming the president’s blessing as a ticket to victory.
DEMOCRACY ’26: STAY UP TO DATE WITH THE FOX NEWS ELECTION HUB
Trump’s endorsement power has been a force in recent GOP fights, reshaping contests from Indiana to Texas. When he backs someone, it often clears a path and signals to donors and activists who to rally behind. Still, endorsements aren’t magic; timing and local sentiment matter just as much as the name on the invitation list.
A recent example showed limits to last-minute influence when the president endorsed Rep. Randy Feenstra in Iowa, only to see him narrowly lose to Zach Lahn. That race drew backing from groups tied to the MAHA movement and influential conservative organizations, and yet the endorsement didn’t close the deal. The takeaway for operatives is that momentum and ground game still beat a late thumbs-up alone.
In South Carolina, contenders spent months signaling loyalty to Trump’s agenda, hoping to catch his eye. After a period of neutrality, the president named Evette an “America First Patriot” and called her a “WINNER” in his endorsement. He even headlined a tele-rally for her on the eve of the vote, using every tool available to lift her name and energize supporters.
Evette made the endorsement central to her closing pitch, posting on social media that Trump “needs a strong partner as Governor who will deliver on our conservative America First agenda. It’s why he gave me his ‘complete and total endorsement.’ Don’t let President Trump down. Get to the polls, bring your friends & family, and VOTE EVETTE!”
But the endorsement carried a complication: the president also suggested he expected Evette to pick Henry McMaster Jr., the governor’s son, as lieutenant governor. That suggestion sparked immediate blowback in state political circles and raised questions about perceived backroom deals. Locals bristled at any hint of outside pressure on a state contest where homegrown credibility counts for a lot.
Governor McMaster denied any deal or undue pressure, and Evette insisted she would not name a running mate until after the primary. The younger McMaster withdrew his name, calling the attention “incredibly humbling” and adding that “now is simply not the right time.” His exit calmed one flashpoint but left a residue of unease about how the endorsement was handled.
Longtime South Carolina strategist Dave Wilson summed up the danger for outside power brokers, saying the endorsement “backfired.” He warned, “In South Carolina, we really don’t take it very well when Washington tries to tell us what to do.” That simple truth about local pride could be the factor that turns a presidential nod into a mixed blessing rather than a straight ticket to victory.
The stage is set for a runoff that will test whether national influence or state instincts matter more when the margin is thin. Campaigns will now pivot to turnout and persuasion on the ground, and how Republicans interpret this episode will shape how future endorsements are wielded. Whoever advances will need more than a famous name behind them; they will need voters who feel their choice was respected, not directed.
Graduate Student, wife, engaged political and legal writer.