Stelter And His Guests Humiliate Themselves, This Was The Cheesiest Lineup Ever

Oh, Stelter—Tell me you’re a pompous phony, without telling me you’re a pompous phony.

During a CNN segment where host Brian Stelter did his best to fake outrage over Florida laws, I couldn’t help but notice a gleaming lineup in cast members during his performance. Like a poorly written play, Stelter introduced a man who identifies as ‘trans’ to argue against Florida’s law that gives parents the right to teach their children about gender roles. Later in the segment, he introduces a political correspondent, who happens to be black, to argue for the critical race.

What’s even more ironic is that the entire crew spent the segment accusing conservatives of ‘framing’ the pro parents’ choice movement. It was so cheesy, like a bad sitcom.

You just have to see it for yourself.

Stelter began by claiming that parents’ efforts to block child-grooming in schools and claims, “when I see some of the coverage in the last week, seems to me they are just repeating an ugly history.”

The outlet tried to portray those efforts as ‘framing’, claiming that outlets who report pro parents’ choice as evil masterminds are hellbent on feeding the public with some fake homophobic message. Stelter added that outlets, like Fox, “they know what they’re doing. This is something that’s very compelling and scary to their audience.” The CNN lapdog completely missed the key element to the movement to maintain a parent’s right to raise their children how they want—The parents.

I don’t think anyone is afraid of the LBGTQ community but their lifestyle choices should not be forcefully indoctrinated into the minds of small children. That’s the real message behind Florida’s push to support the parents of small children in the public school system.

Stelters token trans guest, ‘Charlotte’ Clymer felt particularly enraged at the mention of state rights, “I think it’s insulting to the parents of Florida. It says to the parents of Florida that we can’t talk about LGBTQ families without talking about sex. And it is this very strange need by Governor DeSantis and the Republican Party of Florida to I would say sexualize LGBTQ families in a way that you would never see done to non-LGBTQ families. I have so many friends who are LGBTQ parents or parents of LGBTQ children and they are shocked and exasperated by what’s going on right now, they don’t feel that they can be in schools or their communities without seeing this kind of backlash from conservative lawmakers. And it’s really unfortunate to watch.”

Natasha Alford, the only black voice on the show, was of course set up to incorporate critical race theory into the argument saying, “If you frame, you know, critical race theory against parental rights then people feel, okay, we have a right to be upset. If you think about — go back to segregation. There was a parental rights argument about, well, we shouldn’t be integrating and having our kids in schools based on race because that will introduce another level of intimacy or relationship. And so when you go at that personal angle, you will actually get a lot of people who miss the sort of bigger picture behind what this bill is really about and it has a chilling effect.”

So, let’s round that up…

CNN, who should have the ‘news’ stricken from their title, “framed” a segment where the outraged white guy, played by Stelter, introduces a trans person to discuss LBGTQ “education” that the left wants to push on children as young as 3-years-old. They then finished their framework with the only black person in the debate tying it into the completely separate issue of critical Race Theory propaganda? All the while they accuse conservatives of framing the news?

Did I get that right? Watch and let me know what you see here:

BRIAN STELTER: There is an ugly history in the United States of portraying gays, lesbians, transgender people as perverts, as predators who are preying on children. And when I see some of the coverage in the last week, seems to me they are just repeating an ugly history.

CHARLOTTE CLYMER: Good morning, Brian. Yeah, it’s exasperating to watch all this go down. I can’t believe that it’s 2022 and we’re still seeing LGBTQ families be framed as predatory or as divisive or I would say as almost perverted. I mean that seems to be the message to millions of LGBTQ families by the actions of Governor DeSantis right now. It’s heartbreaking to watch because these are families who already struggle to get by day to day in the public square and now have their own government going after them just for existing.

STELTER: But when you hear the framing on the right, this is just about parents’ rights, just about parents’ rights, what does that get wrong? What’s wrong with that?

CLYMER: I think it’s insulting to the parents of Florida. It says to the parents of Florida that we can’t talk about LGBTQ families without talking about sex. And it is this very strange need by Governor DeSantis and the Republican Party of Florida to I would say sexualize LGBTQ families in a way that you would never see done to non-LGBTQ families. I have so many friends who are LGBTQ parents or parents of LGBTQ children and they are shocked and exasperated by what’s going on right now, they don’t feel that they can be in schools or their communities without seeing this kind of backlash from conservative lawmakers. And it’s really unfortunate to watch.

STELTER: Rhetorically, Natasha, do you see this as effective? I don’t mean to talk about all of this in terms of politics only, but when I’m watching the Fox coverage this week I’m thinking they know what they’re doing. This is something that’s very compelling and scary to their audience.

NATASHA ALFORD: Brian, you’re right, it’s brilliant framing because you can’t argue with a parent’s right to influence their child. Parents care deeply about their children. I’m a parent, I get it. And when you focus on this particular subset Kindergarten through 3rd grade, again, it’s very smart and its strategic because most parents will say, yeah, I guess that makes sense, it seems pretty common sense that we wouldn’t be talking about sex or sexual orientation, but it sort of hides the real intention behind the bill and the thing about parental rights framing is that this is not the first time we’ve seen this in American history.

If you frame, you know, critical race theory against parental rights then people feel, okay, we have a right to be upset. If you think about — go back to segregation. There was a parental rights argument about, well, we shouldn’t be integrating and having our kids in schools based on race because that will introduce another level of intimacy or relationship. And so when you go at that personal angle, you will actually get a lot of people who miss the sort of bigger picture behind what this bill is really about and it has a chilling effect. When you say there could be consequences for even touching this issue people are more likely to not want to touch the issue at all which marginalizes groups, which takes a family that maybe has two mothers or two fathers and you say, all right, I can’t read that book or we can’t have that conversation in class because I don’t want to be penalized as a teacher. There’s a little bit more to the bill than just parents’ rights and I think that’s what we have to remember.