CIA Director John Ratcliffe has declassified the appendix from the Durham report and handed over the documents to Senator Chuck Grassley. This move has revealed some shocking details. The Department of Justice had previously assigned federal prosecutor John Durham in 2019 to dive deep into the origins of Crossfire Hurricane, the FBI’s investigation into whether President Donald Trump’s campaign in 2016 worked with Russia to influence the election.
The findings were quite eye-opening. Durham’s 306-page unclassified report laid bare the bureau’s investigation, suggesting it was a politically motivated attack orchestrated by the Obama administration. This was based on “raw, unanalyzed, and uncorroborated intelligence,” ignoring contradictory information, and lacking fundamental due diligence.
Misconduct was a key focus. The report highlighted how an FBI attorney allegedly altered an email to support a FISA renewal request targeting a Trump campaign adviser. It also shed light on the contrasting approach the bureau took when dealing with failed presidential candidate Hillary Clinton’s alleged pay-to-play scheme.
A significant part of the report was the FBI’s heavy reliance on a foreign-sourced political opposition research report, partly funded by the Clinton campaign. The FBI reportedly knew the contents of this report were unreliable. But there was more to Durham’s report than met the eye initially.
This hidden part of the report, a 29-page classified appendix, was released by Senator Grassley. It offered insights into the FBI’s intentional oversight under former Director James Comey concerning intelligence that the Clinton campaign fabricated the Russia collusion narrative. The Durham annex painted a picture of the FBI not only playing along with the false narrative but actively weaponizing it against Trump.
The appendix claimed that the Obama administration received intelligence through two separate memos. These memos described confidential conversations involving then-Democratic National Committee Chair Debbie Wasserman Schultz and two individuals at George Soros’ Open Society Foundations. The memos were received in January and March of 2016.
These conversations indicated former President Barack Obama’s alleged intentions to derail the FBI’s investigation into Clinton’s use of a private email server. Clinton’s mishandling of classified information while serving as secretary of state was also a focus. The annex quotes a source saying, ‘The FBI will put more oil into the fire.’
This revelation has stirred up conversations about the FBI’s role in the Russia collusion story. The appendix reveals strong indications that the FBI decided to go along with the Clinton campaign’s plan. It seems they chose to use the false narrative against Trump.
The report’s release has reignited discussions about the FBI’s conduct. Many are questioning the bureau’s motives and actions during this period. The details provided by the Durham annex have given critics more ammunition in their argument against the FBI’s handling of the investigation.
The information from the report and its appendix is causing ripples across political circles. The actions of some past administrations are coming under increased scrutiny. This adds another layer to the ongoing debates about political interference and integrity.
The appendix’s release has also brought renewed attention to the Obama administration. The alleged efforts to undermine the FBI’s investigation into Clinton’s email server are now being discussed more broadly. The involvement of high-level political figures adds weight to the allegations.
The revelations have sparked a fresh wave of criticism against the FBI. The bureau’s actions during the Crossfire Hurricane investigation are now being re-evaluated. The implications of these findings are significant and raise questions about the integrity of past investigations.
As more details come to light, the political landscape continues to shift. These findings are influencing public opinion on the FBI and political figures from the past. The conversation around these issues is likely to continue for some time.
The declassified appendix has opened the door to further investigations. It suggests that the Clinton campaign’s actions were more calculated than previously thought. The FBI’s participation in this narrative is now under the microscope.
This development underscores the importance of transparency and accountability in government agencies. The actions of the FBI and other involved parties are being dissected. The public is demanding answers and accountability from those in power.
The exposure of these documents might have long-term implications for the FBI. Public trust in the bureau’s impartiality has been shaken. This incident serves as a reminder of the need for checks and balances within government institutions.
The Durham report and its appendix have reignited discussions about political bias within the FBI. The bureau’s handling of the investigation into Trump’s campaign is being scrutinized. The role of political influence in shaping investigative actions is a topic of concern.
The release of these documents is a significant event in the ongoing debate about political accountability. The actions of the FBI and the Clinton campaign are being re-evaluated in light of this new information. The conversation is far from over as more people seek to understand the full implications of these findings.
