Pentagon Launches DOJ Task Force, Targets Media Leakers


Follow America's fastest-growing news aggregator, Spreely News, and stay informed. You can find all of our articles plus information from your favorite Conservative voices. 

Pentagon Secretary Pete Hegseth announced a joint task force with the Department of Justice to find and prosecute officials who leak sensitive information to the press, and he has empowered the Pentagon’s Office of General Counsel to gather records and support across the department for leak investigations. The move follows DOJ subpoenas tied to reporting about a plane gifted to President Trump, plus growing tensions over how far the government should go to protect classified and operational details.

The secretary made clear that this is a coordinated effort with federal prosecutors and not a political stunt. He thanked Acting U.S. Attorney General Todd Blanche for the cooperation and said the departments are collaborating closer than ever to protect national security and service members.

Hegseth formally delegated authority to the Office of General Counsel and put it in charge of requesting and receiving material related to media leak probes. “To combat the dangers that leaks pose, effectively immediately, I have ​delegated tasking authority ​to the war department’s ‌office ⁠of general counsel, empowering OGC to request and receive ​all ​information, ⁠records and support across the ​department concerning ​media ⁠leak investigations,” he said in a video shared on X.

The secretary did not sugarcoat the stakes for national defense or for troops in the field. “Leaked information risks lives, these new tools and processes will greatly assist us in protecting our joint force,” Hegseth continued. “The security of our nation cannot be a bargaining chip for those who seek momentary headlines, access to confidential and secret information is a sacred trust, and those who betray that trust will be met with the full force of the law.”

This announcement comes days after the Justice Department issued subpoenas to four New York Times reporters tied to a story about security concerns with an aircraft gifted to President Donald Trump by Qatar that he flew to a recent NATO summit. The subpoenas sought testimony before a federal grand jury as part of a leak probe into how sensitive information reached reporters.

Those subpoenas drew sharp criticism from parts of the media and press freedom groups, who say aggressive legal steps into journalistic sources chill reporting. “The appearance of federal law enforcement agents on the doorstep of news reporters should shock the conscience of any American who believes in the Constitution and the press freedom it protects,” an attorney for that newspaper, David McCraw, said in a statement.

McCraw framed the subpoenas as intimidation and warned they threaten the public’s right to know. “Our journalists report the facts and advance the American public’s right to know how their government is operating and their taxpayer dollars are being used,” McCraw added. “This brazen act should be seen as nothing more than an attempt to prevent the public from knowing what is happening in their country by intimidating journalists from doing their jobs.”

Hegseth’s stance on leaks is consistent with steps he has taken since leading the Pentagon, including opening investigations into suspected leakers and even proposing polygraphs as a way to identify who betrayed classified material. He also moved to tighten ground rules for reporters covering the Pentagon, pushing a pledge that would bar solicitation of unauthorized material regardless of its classification.

Those press restrictions prompted resistance from many Pentagon reporters, most of whom surrendered their press credentials rather than accept strict new limits on how they can gather news. Legal challenges followed, and a judge recently granted a preliminary injunction against the requirement that journalists be shadowed by a department chaperone at all times, finding that policy raised First Amendment problems in response to a case brought by The New York Times.

Share:

GET MORE STORIES LIKE THIS

IN YOUR INBOX!

Sign up for our daily email and get the stories everyone is talking about.

Discover more from Liberty One News

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading