Mary Peltola’s attendance record from years in the Alaska state House and Bethel City Council, plus missed votes while serving in Congress, has become a key line of attack as she campaigns for the U.S. Senate. Records show notable gaps in voting and meeting attendance, critics argue those gaps matter for a Senate seat, while her campaign points to maternity leave and community obligations as explanations. Republican operatives and party committees have seized on the numbers to question her fitness for full-time Senate work, and the debate now joins the broader fight for control of the chamber. Alaska’s unusual top-four primary and ranked-choice general election mean turnout and messaging will decide whether voters prioritize attendance and accomplishments or other issues.
Official records list Peltola as missing 794 of 4,265 state House votes, or 18.6%, over five terms from 1999 to 2009, and 22 of 60 Bethel City Council meetings, or 36.67%, from 2011 to 2013. The highest state House absence totals came in the 23rd Legislature, where she reportedly missed 334 of 1,019 votes. City notes show nine missed council meetings out of 22 in 2013 and 11 of 32 in 2012. Those figures are at the center of Republican criticisms that she was not reliably present for duties at the local and state levels.
Her record in Washington has also drawn fire, with GovTrack-style tallies cited by critics that say she missed 235 of 1,370 roll-call votes, or 17.2%, while serving in Congress from 2022 to 2024. Opponents highlight the congressional absences alongside the earlier state and city gaps to create a pattern voters can understand quickly. For Republicans, the argument is simple: a senator must show up consistently, especially on crucial votes that affect Alaska’s economy and defense.
“Alaskans deserve an all-the-time workhorse like Dan Sullivan, not someone like Peltola who knifes Alaskans in the back when she even bothers to show up,” Republican National Committee spokesperson Nick Poche said in a statement. The National Republican Senatorial Committee pressed the point in January, saying bluntly, “She couldn’t even get a single bill signed into law,” and using that lack of legislative wins to question readiness for a higher office. Those lines are intended to frame the race around reliability and results rather than rhetoric.
Peltola’s campaign pushes back with context that appeals to many voters: she is a mother of seven who took maternity leave after three children were born during her state House service, and the campaign argues excused absences reduce her unexcused miss rate to roughly 6%. Campaign statements note she advanced bipartisan measures, worked on public safety in rural Alaska, and supported efforts to boost energy production. They also explain some council meeting misses as tied to seasonal commitments like fish camp and other community priorities.
Supporters and allies of her opponent have responded by pointing to parallel problems with Dan Sullivan’s record, accusing him of his own attendance lapses. A Peltola spokesperson criticized Sullivan for missing votes and hearings, calling his absences “an insult to Alaskans” and saying that Sullivan has been “slacking off” missing fisheries subcommittee hearings. That exchange underscores how both campaigns are using attendance and committee activity to attack credibility on issues that matter to Alaskans, like fisheries and resource development.
Beyond attendance, Republicans emphasize tangible lawmaking as the clearest measure of effectiveness, contrasting Peltola’s record on bills signed into law with Sullivan’s list of enacted measures. The NRSC and other GOP groups have framed that contrast as proof of who can deliver results for Alaska in the Senate. Democrats counter that raw counts of signed bills do not capture constituent service, bipartisan negotiations, or work on amendments and appropriations that never bear a single sponsor’s name.
The race itself is being run inside Alaska’s distinctive system: a nonpartisan top-four primary followed by ranked-choice voting in the general election. That setup rewards message discipline and broad appeal, and it gives each campaign incentives to paint the other as too unreliable for steady service. Voters will decide whether missed votes and meeting absences are dealbreakers or whether other issues override attendance records as they weigh who should represent Alaska in Washington.
https://x.com/NRSC/status/2010710472903831948?s=20
Graduate Student, wife, engaged political and legal writer.