MSNBC Has Lost Their Minds Over Roe V Wade, Check This Claim Out

Follow America's fastest-growing news aggregator, Spreely News, and stay informed. You can find all of our articles plus information from your favorite Conservative voices. 

The Supreme Court is set to hear a challenge against Roe v Wade this Wednesday and it’s making liberals lose their minds. Just take a look at this crazy interaction between MSNBC host Andrea Mitcher and guest host Chriss Jansing. The two actually compared the pro-life push to the ban on interracial marriage.

The two played a clip of Mississippi Governor Tate Reeves Schooling ‘Meet the Press’ stooge Chuck Todd on Constitutional rights and how abortions aren’t one of them. Shortly after the clip played, things got weird:

TATE REEVES: I believe in a simple reading of the United States Constitution that when Roe was decided in 1973, there is no fundamental right in our United States Constitution to an abortion and furthermore, Chuck, I believe very strongly that if you read the constitution, there is nowhere in the constitution that prohibits individual states, states like Mississippi, to limit access to abortions.

CHRIS JANSING: Melissa, what’s the other side of this argument about constitutionality?

MELISSA MURRAY: Well, Governor Tate Reeves is correct. The right to an abortion or the right to privacy is nowhere explicitly enumerated in the Constitution. But neither are other constitutional principles that we hold sacrosanct like the right to marry, and certainly even though there was a period of time when many individuals in this country would have voted banned interracial marriage or, even more recently, same-sex marriage, the Court has held the Constitution protects those kind of intimate decisions and that too is the logic underlining the right to an abortion. So, it is true, it’s not explicitly in there, but there are a lot of things that are constitutionally guaranteed that are not explicit in the Constitution either.

CHRIS JANSING: And I mention, Joyce, these three appointees that Donald Trump was able to put on the Court. Who in particular and what are you going to be listening for when this comes on Wednesday? Joyce?

JOYCE VANCE: Well Chris, it seems, it seems like the problem that the Supreme Court faces isn’t whether it’s going to preserve abortion rights versus whether it’s going to overturn them. The question is how much will it erode the rights that people in this country have enjoyed for almost the last 50 years? We now have five, possibly six justices who are on record as believing that Roe is wrongly decided or at least significantly overstepped the bounds of the law. And so the question is where this court will land.

Something that really concerns me and that I’ll be looking for this week is Mississippi’s argument that women no longer need this sort of protection. Because they’ve achieved so much in society. And I’m reminded very painfully of Justice Ginsburg’s dissent in the voting rights case where she wrote to the effect that getting rid of the Voting Rights Act is like tossing your umbrella in the middle of a rainstorm because you’re still dry. And the fear is the Supreme Court with this new conservative majority will take action that will leave people in this country, particularly women of color and people who live in lower economic conditions, that it will leave them vulnerable, that they will no longer control their own course. So there’s a lot more at stake in this week’s argument than simply whether or not Roe v. Wade survives.

Watch
`

I tell ya…

The left’s ability to twist a narrative is pretty amazing but nothing, absolutely nothing, compares to MSNBC’s ability to bring race into every topic. I would be impressed if it wasn’t so nauseating how they overplay this one hand.

Share:

GET MORE STORIES LIKE THIS

IN YOUR INBOX!

Sign up for our daily email and get the stories everyone is talking about.

Advertisement

Trending

Discover more from Liberty One News

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading