McDaniel Demands Mamdani Fire Lina Khan, Protect NYC Affordability


Follow America's fastest-growing news aggregator, Spreely News, and stay informed. You can find all of our articles plus information from your favorite Conservative voices. 

Ronna McDaniel has publicly challenged New York City mayor-elect Zohran Mamdani over his choice to put former Biden FTC chair Lina Khan in a top advisory role, arguing that the pick undercuts promises to make the city more affordable and threatens to import heavy-handed Washington regulation to a fragile local economy.

McDaniel, now leading a conservative group called the Competitiveness Coalition, opened a direct line to Mamdani and made her concerns plain: this appointment is not a symbolic move, it signals policy direction. From a Republican angle, that direction looks like more regulation, higher costs, and fewer jobs for everyday New Yorkers.

“He’s saying one thing and doing another by putting her as the co-chair of his transition team,” McDaniel told reporters, pointing to a gap between campaign rhetoric and governing reality. That critique lands especially hard when prices and business flight are already front-of-mind for residents and owners who keep the city humming.

“Lina Khan, for us, represents the embodiment of inflation in this country, and Bidenomics. I think she’s the best example of somebody who raised prices across this country by fighting entrepreneurship, and innovation, and big business, and capitalism.”

Her argument rests on Khan’s record at the Federal Trade Commission, where she was known for taking a confrontational stance against major companies and mergers. From a Republican perspective, aggressive antitrust enforcement that chills investment and punishes scale ends up harming workers and consumers more than it helps them.

McDaniel’s letter lays out specific worries: opposition to mergers that could have preserved jobs and keeping regulators cozy with foreign counterparts in ways that saddle U.S. firms with extra red tape. Those moves, she warns, feed a narrative that regulation isn’t just domestic policy but a lever that can weaken American firms in global competition.

“Later in her term, reports even surfaced that Khan was communicating with Temu, a Chinese-owned company linked to the Chinese Communist Party, in an attempt to gather damaging information on American retailers,” McDaniel wrote to Mamdani. “Surely we can agree that handicapping American innovators to benefit their CCP-linked rivals harms our geopolitical standing.”

Beyond national security flags, McDaniel framed the appointment as a real test of Mamdani’s fiscal promises. She insists voters were sold a vision of affordability that depends on growing business and jobs, not squeezing them with higher taxes and heavier oversight that could send firms packing.

She spelled out the practical consequences plainly: businesses will move to friendlier tax climates and lighter regulatory states if New York starts stacking the deck against profitability. That migration isn’t theory; it’s a pattern seen where punitive policies accumulate and capital reshuffles toward opportunity and predictability.

“When you look at what Mamdani ran on, these things that sound good but in practice won’t be good – rent control, government-run grocery stores, free bussing, raising the corporate tax rate … it sounds good, but it’s not tenable and what it means is that businesses will say, ‘Guess where I’m not going to do business in? New York City. I’m going to go to states that have better tax rates, that have less regulation, that will allow me to pay my employees and grow,” McDaniel contended.

She also tapped into a broader critique about big-government experiments sold to younger voters as idealistic fixes. “That’s why socialism is sometimes confusing, especially for young voters,” the former RNC chair added. “All it means is an inefficient, loaded government that will cost more taxpayer money and will cost you more and leave less jobs in the long run.”

McDaniel wants Mamdani to choose either the rhetoric of affordability or the policy team that has repeatedly backed Biden-era trade and regulatory strategies she blames for higher prices. From the GOP view, this is a moment to call out mixed signals and demand elected leaders match their staffing choices to the promises they made on the campaign trail.

For New Yorkers watching the transition, the stakes are straightforward: whether the city will pursue policies that prioritize growth and opportunity or double down on interventions that, critics say, raise costs and shrink choices. McDaniel’s call is a classic Republican playbook move—push for accountability, defend markets, and warn that well-intentioned ideas can have costly second acts.

Share:

GET MORE STORIES LIKE THIS

IN YOUR INBOX!

Sign up for our daily email and get the stories everyone is talking about.

Discover more from Liberty One News

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading