Joe Biden Briefed on North Korea Launch via Private Email Account


Follow America's fastest-growing news aggregator, Spreely News, and stay informed. You can find all of our articles plus information from your favorite Conservative voices. 

Joe Biden’s private email scandal is shaping up to be even more alarming than Hillary Clinton’s infamous private server controversy. New revelations indicate that, during his tenure as Vice President, Biden was briefed on a highly sensitive North Korea missile launch using a private email account. This raises serious concerns about national security and accountability. Despite these revelations, Special Counsel Robert Hur has failed to investigate Biden’s use of burner phones and pseudonymous email accounts.

Email records released by the National Archives reveal that then-Vice President Biden received sensitive foreign policy information through private accounts under pseudonyms such as “[email protected],” “[email protected],” and “[email protected].” According to a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit filed by the Southern Legal Foundation, the National Archives (NARA) has identified 82,000 pages of emails related to these pseudonymous accounts.

NARA’s report stated: “NARA has completed a search for potentially responsive documents and is currently processing those documents for the purpose of producing non-exempt portions of any responsive records on a monthly rolling basis.” The FOIA request covers all emails from three pseudonym accounts spanning an eight-year period, making the volume of responsive records exceptionally large. NARA’s findings suggest that Biden used these accounts to conduct official government business and potentially illicit dealings with foreign officials.

One notable email exchange occurred in April 2012, when then-national security advisor Antony Blinken, now Secretary of State, briefed Biden on a failed North Korean missile launch. The email, sent to “[email protected],” contained sensitive details about the missile’s malfunction. Blinken wrote, “Just in case you missed it, the North Korean rocket failed somewhere between the first and second stages. Will take some time to determine why.” He signed the email with “Tony.”

The use of private emails for such sensitive matters contradicts federal guidelines requiring government officials to conduct official business through secure, government-managed systems. Critics argue that Biden’s practices not only endangered national security but also circumvented transparency requirements like FOIA.

The scandal draws comparisons to Hillary Clinton’s private email controversy, in which she used a private server to conduct State Department business, including transmitting classified information. Clinton’s actions led to a high-profile FBI investigation that ultimately declined to press charges, despite clear evidence of misconduct. Clinton’s team went so far as to use BleachBit software to delete emails, many of which she claimed were about personal matters like yoga and her daughter’s wedding.

Similarly, Biden’s pseudonymous email accounts have raised suspicions about efforts to avoid scrutiny and oversight. Hunter Biden’s laptop, which contains communications implicating Joe Biden in his son’s business dealings, first exposed the existence of these private accounts. Emails showed Biden coordinating with Hunter and others about official and personal matters, blurring the line between his public duties and private interests.

Critics are calling for greater accountability. “This scandal underscores the need for transparency in government,” said one legal expert. “Using private email accounts for official business undermines trust and creates opportunities for abuse.”

Despite these revelations, Special Counsel Robert Hur has not pursued an investigation into Biden’s use of burner phones and private emails. This lack of action has fueled allegations of a double standard in how the justice system handles prominent political figures. Some argue that Biden’s actions are potentially more egregious than Clinton’s, given the volume of emails and the sensitive nature of the information involved.

The Southern Legal Foundation’s lawsuit forced NARA to search for Biden’s pseudonymous emails, exposing the sheer scale of his private correspondence. The archive’s findings—including 5,138 email messages and 25 electronic files already tied to Biden’s pseudonyms—represent just a fraction of the potential trove of documents.

The timing and content of these emails have reignited debates about government accountability. The fact that Biden received classified briefings on private accounts raises questions about whether these practices were intended to evade oversight. Critics point to parallels with Clinton’s server scandal, arguing that both cases highlight systemic issues within the government’s approach to handling sensitive information.

Republican lawmakers and watchdog organizations are now calling for a full investigation into Biden’s email practices. “The American people deserve to know whether their leaders are abiding by the rules,” said a congressional staffer. “If Joe Biden used private emails to conduct official business, it’s a serious breach of public trust.”

As these revelations continue to unfold, public pressure is mounting for a thorough examination of Biden’s email practices. With trust in government at a historic low, such scandals only deepen public skepticism. The parallels to Clinton’s email controversy suggest that this issue will remain a flashpoint in the broader debate about transparency, accountability, and the rule of law in American politics.

Share:

GET MORE STORIES LIKE THIS

IN YOUR INBOX!

Sign up for our daily email and get the stories everyone is talking about.

Advertisement

Trending

Discover more from Liberty One News

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading