Hillary Clinton recently made waves with her comments suggesting that former Presidents Bill Clinton and Barack Obama might consider running for a third term if Donald Trump attempts to do the same. Her remarks were featured during an NBC interview on *Meet the Press*, and they have sparked considerable discussion. According to Fox News, Clinton’s comments have stirred reactions from various commentators, including Jesse Watters.
Jesse Watters from Fox News reacted sharply to Clinton’s claims, dismissing the possibility of a third term for Obama or Clinton. Watters remarked, “Michelle would never let Barry run again – she hated the White House. And Bill’s almost 80, we don’t need another Biden in Washington.”
Clinton is known for her strong opinions on Trump, often painting him as a threat to the political system. Her recent comments seemed to follow this pattern of cautioning against Trump’s actions. Clinton stated: “Listen to what Trump says. He telegraphs everything. And often when he’s criticizing something, he’s criticizing them for what he’s already done or intends to do.”
She went on to elaborate on her concerns about Trump’s intentions and his supporters. Clinton suggested that Trump might have allies working to make a third term possible. She noted, “When he says, ‘You know, there are people who think that it could happen,’ what he’s saying is he has people right now in these right-wing think tanks trying to figure out how to make it happen.”
Clinton also took a jab at Trump’s supporters, suggesting they are overly militant. Her remarks implied that they would not view legal obstacles as a hindrance. This kind of rhetoric is typical of Clinton’s approach when discussing Trump’s base.
The discussion took a turn when Clinton proposed the idea of Obama and her husband running again if Trump pursued a third term. She commented, “I think you have to take all of it seriously. The best response might be for, you know, Barack and Bill to run too.”
Her suggestion seemed to be made in jest, highlighting the absurdity she perceives in Trump’s actions. Clinton added, “I mean, OK, take your choice! Who do you want for a third term, people? If this is where we’re heading, we’re going to break the Constitution, give people a choice!”
Clinton’s comments reflect her belief that the political climate is becoming increasingly unpredictable. She expressed embarrassment at the notion of discussing such a possibility. Yet, she insists it is a scenario worth contemplating.
This isn’t the first time a third term for Trump has been a topic of conversation. During his presidency, there was speculation about Trump possibly seeking to extend his time in office. However, it’s important to note that Trump himself did not initiate this discussion.
The conversation about a potential third term circulated for weeks during Trump’s administration. Eventually, Trump addressed the speculation, making it clear he was not entertaining the idea. In an interview, he stated, “I’m not looking at that,” regarding a third term and acknowledged, “to the best of my knowledge, you’re not allowed to do it.”
Despite Trump’s statements, Clinton continues to use the topic to energize Democratic supporters. Her comments are aimed at mobilizing the base by invoking fears of constitutional breaches. This strategy is consistent with her tactics in previous political engagements.
Clinton’s remarks have resonated with those wary of Trump’s influence on American politics. By suggesting a preemptive counteraction, she aims to highlight what she sees as potential threats. Her strategy involves keeping the possibility of a third term in the public discourse.
As the political landscape evolves, Clinton’s comments serve as a reminder of the ongoing tensions between party lines. Her statements are part of a broader narrative used to critique Trump. This approach is emblematic of Clinton’s long-standing political style.
The debate surrounding a third term, while speculative, underscores deeper concerns about political power and limits. Clinton’s remarks tap into these anxieties, keeping the conversation alive. Her influence remains significant as she continues to voice her perspective on national issues.
