The Senate moved on a fast, awkward split over President Donald Trump’s use of emergency powers to impose steep tariffs, with five GOP senators joining Democrats to advance a resolution striking down the action on Brazil. That vote exposed a rift inside the party even as many Republicans stayed loyal to the president, and a House rule will block any follow-up until January. Lawmakers traded sharp lines about leverage, taxes, and the constitutional role of the House while the policy fight widened to include Canada and global tariffs.
A 52-48 vote sent the Kaine-led resolution forward after five Senate Republicans broke with the president, but the measure won’t reach the House this month because of a rules move limiting tariff-related action until January. The dissenters were Senators Susan Collins, Lisa Murkowski, Mitch McConnell, Rand Paul and Thom Tillis, who joined all Senate Democrats to advance the measure. That kind of cross-party vote is rare and it underscores a procedural as well as political clash inside the GOP.
TRUMP ASKS SUPREME COURT FOR URGENT RULING ON TARIFF POWERS AS ‘STAKES COULD NOT BE HIGHER’
Vice President JD Vance pushed back hard in a closed-door lunch, urging Senators not to undercut the president’s trade leverage. “To vote against that is to strip that incredible leverage from the president of the United States. I think it’s a huge mistake and I know most of the people in there agree with me,” he said, repeating a point that has become central to the White House defense. That appeal framed tariffs as a bargaining chip for future deals Republicans favor.
Senators pushing back on the president argued a constitutional and policy line about emergency power and where tax policy should originate. Senator Tim Kaine led the challenge, saying tariffs on Brazil made no sense and suggested they were a favor for a political ally. Kaine has plans to bring separate resolutions aimed at Canadian and global tariffs later this week, signaling the fight is far from over.
SCHUMER AGAIN BLOCKS GOP BID TO REOPEN GOVERNMENT AS AIR TRAFFIC CONTROLLERS GO UNPAID
Trump declared the Brazil tariffs under emergency authority this summer, citing what he called an “unusual and extraordinary threat” posed by Brazil’s actions. The move followed earlier tariff fights this year that saw Republicans join Democrats to reject the president’s emergency tariffs on Canada and to challenge global tariffs. Those prior votes set a precedent for this recent rebuke and sharpened questions about when a president should use emergency trade powers.
The Brazil declaration also intersected with political context: Kaine pointed to former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro, who was, at the time of the declaration, facing prosecution related to an attempted coup after the 2022 election. Bolsonaro was sentenced in September, and that backdrop fed arguments about whether the tariffs were truly about national security or about supporting allies. Those political overtones helped motivate some senators to oppose the emergency finding.
DEMOCRATS EYE KEY OBAMACARE DEADLINE AS GOVERNMENT SHUTDOWN ENTERS 4TH WEEK
Rand Paul framed the disagreement in constitutional and economic terms, arguing emergencies are reserved for events like war or natural disaster, not policy disputes over tariffs. “Emergencies are like war, famine, tornado, not liking someone’s tariffs is not an emergency,” he said, and he added a broader tax argument: “Tariffs are an import tax, they are a tax, not a tax on China,” Paul said. “It’s a tax on the people who buy stuff from China, which are mostly Americans. Taxes are supposed to originate in the House, so I will continue to vote to end the emergency.”
Asked why more Senate Republicans did not join his position, Paul gave a blunt answer: “Fear.” That one-word assessment captured the political pressure many members feel when the White House takes a hard line. The episode leaves the party juggling loyalty, leverage and constitutional caution as the tariff fight moves from headlines toward possible court challenges and further congressional motions.
