GOP Keeps DHS Off $80B Minibus, Demands Border Security


Follow America's fastest-growing news aggregator, Spreely News, and stay informed. You can find all of our articles plus information from your favorite Conservative voices. 

Congress released a roughly $80 billion minibus over the weekend that bundles State Department and general government funding while leaving Department of Homeland Security money out, setting up a partisan tug-of-war as the Jan. 30 funding deadline approaches.

House Republicans rolled out a two-bill package that targets foreign affairs, national security, federal financial services and general government operations, and they present it as a lean, conservative spending plan. The package clocks in around $76 billion in federal funds and is expected to get a House vote soon, though the path in the Senate requires 60 votes.

Notably absent is DHS funding, which was expected to be included earlier but is now being held separate amid Democratic outrage over a police-involved shooting in Minneapolis. That omission has turned DHS into leverage for Democrats who say the agency must answer questions about use of force, while Republicans warn cutting homeland security is reckless at a dangerous moment.

The State Department and national security bill includes an $850 million “America First Opportunity Fund,” a pot meant to give the Secretary of State flexibility to react to unexpected events abroad. Republicans argue this kind of targeted funding lets the United States act decisively without bloated, permanent additions to the baseline budget.

Across the bills, conservatives are touting wins that echo the party’s platform, including provisions described by House Appropriations Committee Republicans as supporting “President Trump’s America First foreign policy by eliminating wasteful spending on DEI or woke programming, climate change mandates, and divisive gender ideologies.” Those lines are framed as trimming what Republicans label ideological spending from foreign policy accounts.

Democrats push back by highlighting protections for global health and development accounts, saying the package “supports women globally” by “protecting funding for bilateral family planning and the United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA)” and pointing to billions shifted into a new development assistance account. Expect fights over those priorities to intensify on the floor and in the Senate where 60 votes are required to advance spending bills.

Security assistance is another major element, with millions designated for partners such as Israel and Taiwan, reflecting the GOP emphasis on strong backing for allies. The other bill in the minibus allocates just over $13 billion to the Treasury for the remainder of fiscal year 2026 and includes language that, according to Republicans, prevents the IRS “from targeting individuals or groups for exercising their First Amendment rights or ideological beliefs.”

Funding for the Executive Office of the President and the Federal Judiciary also feature in the package, with $872 million for the Executive Office and $9.69 billion in discretionary funding for the Federal Judiciary. Lawmakers from both parties will fight over these numbers, but Republicans argue these investments protect the machinery of government while checking what they consider federal overreach.

“With this package, we are advancing President Trump’s vision of a golden age defined by security, responsibility, and growth. Our financial system will be protected, small businesses and entrepreneurs supported, and consumer freedom safeguarded,” House Appropriations Committee Chairman Tom Cole, R-Okla., said in a statement. That rhetoric frames the spending as strategic and tightly focused on core conservative goals.

Democratic leaders criticized the bills for rejecting larger programmatic investments, with House Appropriations Committee ranking member Rep. Rosa DeLauro, D-Conn., saying the bill “continues Democrats’ rejection of extreme cuts proposed by the Trump White House and Republicans in Congress.” The public back-and-forth signals a test of whether negotiations will hold or whether brinkmanship leads to a partial shutdown.

Negotiators are reportedly trying to fold DHS funding into a separate minibus that would also include defense, labor, and transportation, a plan that could split dispute points and buy more time. Still, the Jan. 30 funding cliff looms and Senate Democrats hold the leverage to block passage unless GOP leaders secure bipartisan support.

Sen. Chris Murphy, D-Conn., warned that the standoff could produce a shutdown, noting “[Republicans] control the House, the Senate and the presidency. If they don’t want to work with Democrats and shut down the government, that’s up to them,” in comments to a Sunday political program. Speaker Mike Johnson pushed back, saying “I am concerned about that, and we should not be limiting funding for homeland security at a dangerous time. We need public officials to allow law enforcement to do their jobs,” and added, “I think we will.”

Share:

GET MORE STORIES LIKE THIS

IN YOUR INBOX!

Sign up for our daily email and get the stories everyone is talking about.

Discover more from Liberty One News

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading