The Biden White House, it turns out, was deeply involved with the National Archives and the Justice Department in the case against Donald Trump regarding classified documents. This involvement laid the groundwork for the federal case against Trump, which was ultimately dismissed. The nonprofit America First Legal released emails obtained through a lawsuit, revealing this collaboration.
Back in September 2021, Jonathan Su, then-Deputy White House Counsel, was in discussions with the National Archives about boxes allegedly held by Trump. These talks delayed the National Archives from referring the matter to the Justice Department until the White House made a “special access request” the following year.
America First Legal stated on social media that these emails confirm the case against Trump was a “sham prosecution” with the Biden White House’s involvement from the outset.
The legal proceedings focused on accusations that Trump took classified documents to his Mar-a-Lago residence after losing the 2020 election. America First Legal emphasized that the FBI raid on Mar-a-Lago wasn’t about securing documents but rather about using the Justice Department against Trump. On September 15, 2022, Gary Stern, NARA’s general counsel, informed colleagues that Su was updated on the missing boxes issue.
Stern wrote that Su was open to meetings involving various parties and mentioned the need for access to notes from the prior administration. This required making a special access request. The National Archives chose not to send a letter to the DOJ due to ongoing discussions between the White House and Trump’s legal team.
The collaboration between Trump’s team and the National Archives was seen as potentially clarifying or resolving the document issue. However, Trump’s team argued the documents rightfully belonged to him, resisting the requests to hand them over. America First Legal argued that the Biden administration’s actions were a pretext for an FBI-led raid at Mar-a-Lago.
Reports from 2022 highlighted how the Biden White House worked closely with the Justice Department and the National Archives to spark the criminal investigation into Trump’s handling of documents.
The White House nullified Trump’s claims to executive privilege, allowing the FBI to examine evidence from his Florida estate. This marked a significant boost to the investigation’s momentum.
The emails suggest a strategic delay by the National Archives in involving the DOJ due to the active communication with Trump’s legal team. Trump’s cooperation was initially seen as possibly resolving the matter without a larger investigation. Yet, the Biden administration’s later actions suggest a calculated approach to involve federal law enforcement.
The Justice Department’s involvement, spurred by the White House’s request, appeared to have less to do with documents and more with targeting Trump. The emails paint a picture of political maneuvering rather than straightforward legal proceedings. Critics argue that these actions reflect a misuse of governmental powers.
Conservative voices, like those at America First Legal, see this as further evidence of the Biden administration weaponizing federal agencies. They claim the entire episode was orchestrated to undermine Trump. Yet, the case was ultimately dismissed, raising questions about the motivations behind the initial push.
The timeline of events, as revealed by these emails, questions the integrity of the prosecution against Trump. The involvement of high-level officials suggests a politically charged effort to challenge a former president. This controversy underscores ongoing tensions between Trump’s allies and the current administration.
Critics of the Biden administration view this as a clear example of political bias influencing judicial processes. They argue that the federal government’s resources were misused to target a political opponent. The case’s dismissal only adds weight to these claims.
Many conservatives feel vindicated by these revelations, believing they confirm what they suspected all along. The narrative of a politically motivated investigation fits into a broader critique of the Biden administration. This situation continues to fuel debates about the role of politics in legal matters.
The story of these emails and the dismissed case against Trump is just one chapter in a long saga of political rivalry. It highlights the complexities and challenges of navigating legal issues in a highly charged political environment. For now, the debate rages on, with both sides entrenched in their positions.
Brittany Mays is a dedicated mother and passionate conservative news and opinion writer. With a sharp eye for current events and a commitment to traditional values, Brittany delivers thoughtful commentary on the issues shaping today’s world. Balancing her role as a parent with her love for writing, she strives to inspire others with her insights on faith, family, and freedom.
