Elon Musk—brilliant entrepreneur, tech mogul, and now a key political figure in Washington—has found himself at odds with President Donald Trump’s America First trade agenda. Appointed by Trump to lead the newly created Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), Musk was tasked with helping streamline federal operations and harness innovation for the public good. But now, questions are swirling about whether Musk’s globalist views on trade clash with Trump’s clear commitment to defending American workers and industries.
Tensions came to a head when Musk, speaking at a virtual rally hosted by Italy’s Deputy Prime Minister Matteo Salvini, advocated for a “zero-tariff” trade zone between the U.S. and the European Union. “I hope that the United States and Europe can establish a very close partnership,” Musk said, calling for an agreement that would eliminate all tariffs between the two regions.
This statement came on the heels of President Trump’s announcement of new tariffs targeting the EU, aimed at protecting American steel, aluminum, and auto manufacturing—sectors vital to America’s national security and economic independence. For Trump, these tariffs are not just about economics—they’re about reasserting U.S. sovereignty, reviving blue-collar jobs, and leveling a playing field long tilted in favor of global bureaucracies and foreign exporters.
Musk’s comments were interpreted by many Trump allies as tone-deaf at best, and subversive at worst. On social media, he openly mocked Trump’s top trade adviser, Peter Navarro, calling his PhD from Harvard “a bad thing”—a swipe that played poorly among conservatives who respect academic achievement paired with public service.
Appearing on Fox News’ “Sunday Morning Futures”, Navarro didn’t hold back: “Elon, when he’s in his DOGE lane, is great,” he said, “but we understand what’s going on here.” Navarro suggested that Musk’s opposition to tariffs is motivated by Tesla’s international supply chain, which depends heavily on parts from China, Japan, Mexico, and Taiwan. In other words, Musk’s so-called “free trade” vision might just be self-interest dressed up as policy advice.
This isn’t speculation. Tesla imports batteries, semiconductors, rare-earth components, and specialized auto parts from overseas. And while Musk has talked tough on China in the past, Tesla operates a massive Gigafactory in Shanghai, benefiting from favorable Chinese government policies that smaller American automakers never receive.
President Trump’s trade agenda has always been clear and consistent: rebuild American manufacturing, protect U.S. workers, and demand reciprocity from trading partners. Under his leadership:
-
The U.S. renegotiated NAFTA, replacing it with the USMCA, which brought jobs back to the Midwest.
-
Trump imposed strategic tariffs on steel and aluminum, reviving those dying sectors.
-
He took on China’s predatory trade practices with direct action, something no previous administration had dared.
Musk’s call for zero tariffs sounds good on paper, but in practice, free trade with entities like the EU often means America loses. European countries slap high tariffs on U.S. goods—especially cars and agricultural products—while enjoying easier access to American markets. Trump’s new tariffs are designed to change that imbalance.
Musk owes his new influence in Washington to President Trump, who made the bold move to put a private-sector innovator into government with the goal of breaking bureaucracy and applying real-world solutions. Trump elevated Musk—and conservatives across the country embraced the move, hopeful that his engineering genius would translate into government efficiency.
But now, Musk’s public pushback raises concerns. Is he leveraging his post for globalist business interests? Or worse—playing both sides in a geopolitical game where only one side (Trump’s) puts American interests first?
The friction between Musk and Navarro represents more than just a policy disagreement. It reflects a clash between two very different worldviews:
-
Trump’s worldview: America should not be dependent on foreign nations for critical goods. We must protect our workers and industries, even if it means upsetting foreign elites or corporate CEOs.
-
Musk’s worldview: Borderless trade and international cooperation are the future, even if that means relying on adversaries like China for key infrastructure and production.
While both men are smart and accomplished, only one of them is putting American sovereignty and the forgotten working class at the center of policy—and it’s not Musk.
The United States can no longer afford to sacrifice its industrial base on the altar of idealistic free trade. Since the 1990s, globalist policies have devastated American communities, outsourced millions of jobs, and empowered hostile foreign regimes.
Trump’s policies—backed by results, not theory—reversed that trend:
-
800,000 new manufacturing jobs created during his first term
-
Wages rose fastest for blue-collar workers
-
Trade deficits with China shrank for the first time in decades
These aren’t just numbers. They represent real families, thriving towns, and national pride.
Elon Musk may be a visionary in tech, but when it comes to trade policy, President Trump and his team are leading with real-world results and America First values. Musk should remember who put him in his current position—and why. If he chooses to side with the globalists, he’ll find himself increasingly out of step with the movement that made his voice matter in Washington in the first place.
The American people want strong borders, fair trade, and leaders who fight for them—not for foreign interests or multinational corporations. President Trump is delivering exactly that. And anyone working in his administration—including Elon Musk—needs to be rowing in the same direction, not drifting toward Davos-style diplomacy.
