A bipartisan group of lawmakers is pressing hard to choke off foreign influence on U.S. college campuses by cutting funding and ending formal ties with universities that operate in hostile nations. The plan targets branch campuses abroad, sensitive research money in fields like AI and biotech, and entities that have spread influence through cultural programs. Key players include Rep. Elise Stefanik and Sen. Rick Scott, who argue national security and academic integrity are at stake.
The legislative package would bar federal dollars to schools that run branch campuses inside countries deemed adversarial and would block research grants in high-risk areas. Lawmakers say the focus is not on innocuous exchanges, but on programs that give foreign governments leverage over what is taught and what research is pursued. China is singled out repeatedly, and critics point to Confucius programs and other ties as vectors of influence.
“I introduced the No Branch Campuses in Hostile Countries Act with Senator Rick Scott, and this is part of the broader higher education reform effort that I have been leading on in the Congress,” Stefanik said in an exclusive interview. She argues that allowing branch campuses and foreign-funded research opens doors for surveillance, intellectual property theft, and ideological pressure on students and faculty. That is why the bill pairs blunt financial consequences with a list of covered nations and activities.
HOUSE GOP LAUNCHES BLITZ OF BILLS TO SHUT DOWN CCP INFILTRATION OF US SCHOOLS: ‘COMMONSENSE’
Stefanik has been a loud voice on campus issues ranging from foreign influence to antisemitism, using hearings and public pressure to force administrative accountability. “[Ours] was the most viewed hearing in the history of Congress. It led to multiple university presidents’ resignations, but importantly, it set off an earthquake in higher education reform. There have been seismic shifts in higher-ed, both in the marketplace, as you’re seeing parents and students voting with their wallets and feet, as it’s shifted,” Stefanik said, pointing to rising demand for alternatives beyond the coastal liberal institutions.
The Defending American Research Act would cut off federal research funding for five years to universities that accept money from certain countries, including Qatar, Venezuela, Turkey and North Korea. Sponsors say the penalty is calibrated to force universities to choose between unvetted foreign funding and federal grants tied to national interests. The bill specifically names sensitive fields like artificial intelligence, biotech and quantum computing where research could have direct national security implications.
STEFANIK TO RELEASE NEW BOOK ON COLLEGE ANTISEMITISM AS SHE EYES BID FOR NY GOVERNOR
Sen. Rick Scott and Rep. Josh Gottheimer are co-sponsors in a move sold as bipartisan but framed squarely from a security-first perspective. Scott has been blunt: America “has enemies” and should “start acting like it” when confronting foreign influence in higher education. He warned that adversary states and hostile actors treat campus programs as footholds to spy, steal research, and shape narratives on the American public square.
“Countries like Communist China and terror-supporting Qatar should not be able to use America’s colleges and universities as outposts to spy on us, steal sensitive research, and spread anti-American propaganda, but we’ve been letting them do it for years,” Scott said, arguing that policy must catch up to the reality of foreign funding and influence. That rhetoric underscores why even nations sometimes seen as cooperative on narrow security items are now on the list of concern when it comes to campus influence operations.
Stefanik points to what she describes as billions of dollars from Doha funneling into programs that prop up hostile or intolerant viewpoints, even singling out professors and donors she calls “pro-terror professors” who skew campus climates. She and allies say the measure is not anti-academic exchange; it is anti-coercion. The idea is to restore the founding missions of higher education and prevent foreign cash from dictating research priorities or curriculum choices.
MORE THAN 160 HOUSE DEMS VOTE AGAINST CRACKDOWN ON FOREIGN INFLUENCE IN US SCHOOLS
Other countries listed across bills include China, Iran, Russia, Cuba and Venezuela, reflecting a broad concern about state-sponsored interference. Some lawmakers expect pushback from campus leaders and international partners, but sponsors insist leverage tied to federal funding is the most effective lever Congress has. The debate now shifts to committee hearings and draft language as the package seeks the votes to move forward.
Backers say the point is practical: make foreign governments pay a price for using U.S. institutions to further hostile objectives and force universities to cut risky ties or face real budget consequences. Expect fierce arguments over definitions, exemptions, and the balance between open scholarship and national defense as the bills head into the legislative process.
