Nearly half of college students say the Soviet Union and Cuba had better economic models than the US, and that fact should alarm anyone who cares about liberty and prosperity. That statistic reflects more than ignorance; it reflects a failed education system, charismatic agitators on campus, and a media ecosystem that rewards slogans over evidence. We need to name what’s happening and push back hard, clearly, and persuasively.
Why this is happening
First, many students have never seen a functioning free market in action, only snapshots of inequality and corporate missteps amplified on social feeds. When your daily diet is outrage and simplified narratives, centralized planning suddenly looks noble and organized by comparison. That’s a marketing victory for bad ideas, not proof they work.
Second, colleges too often treat economic history as a debate between abstract theories rather than lived outcomes that produced hunger, repression, and mass migration. Lectures that gloss over the brutality of Soviet economic collapse or the chronic shortages in Cuba leave space for romantic myths to take root. Without a frank study of results, idealism unintentionally becomes propaganda.
Third, confusion over words like socialism and capitalism lets influencers rebrand failure as virtue. If you don’t define terms precisely, you can sell any system as “fair” or “compassionate,” even when it strips away freedoms and incentives. Clarity of language is the first line of defense against ideological sleight of hand.
A related danger is the erosion of respect for debate and nonviolent exchange. When large numbers of young people think violence can be used to stop speech they dislike, that’s not merely naïve; it’s a direct threat to the democratic order that preserves pluralism. You can’t defend freedom by cutting it off for others.
A Republican response
We should stop treating this as purely an academic problem and start treating it like the civic emergency it is. Conservatives must take the lead on rebuilding a culture that celebrates enterprise, personal responsibility, and the moral case for liberty without shaming people who struggle.
First, bring practical economics back into the classroom. Lessons should include case studies showing how market incentives lifted millions out of poverty, and how command economies repeatedly failed to produce prosperity. Students need concrete examples, not slogans.
Second, expand real-world exposure through internships and entrepreneurship labs that demonstrate how wealth is actually created and sustained. When students build a business, even a small one, they learn the value of incentives, risk, and trade in a way no lecture can match. Hands-on experience replaces theory with reality.
Third, be unapologetic about defending free speech and teaching disagreement as a civic skill. Campus codes that censor or discipline dissent normalize the idea that silencing is acceptable, which dovetails dangerously with the belief that force can stop speech. We must model robust debate and protect it.
Fourth, support conservative and classical liberal groups that offer an alternative intellectual community on campuses. When young people hear firsthand accounts of entrepreneurship, public service, and conservative scholarship, myths lose power. Ideas spread fastest through relationships, not press releases.
Fifth, reach parents and taxpayers who fund higher education and demand accountability for curricula that omit basic economic truth. Public pressure for more balanced teaching is legitimate and effective because education is not a private hobby; it’s an investment in our civic future. Lawmakers and donors should insist on measurable outcomes.
Finally, tell clear moral stories about freedom. The appeal of centralized systems is often emotional: fairness, stability, protection from market chaos. Conservatives must meet that moral hunger with narratives that show how freedom enables dignity, creativity, and flourishing for whole communities. Facts matter, but so do stories.
We can also use the tools those students admire: social media, podcasts, and short-form video that explains complex ideas plainly. If conservatives cede every platform of persuasion to the left, we lose the conversation and the next generation. Communicate boldly, but honestly.
This is not a call to nostalgia for institutions that also need reform; it is a call to defend principles that have delivered prosperity and freedom for generations. The alternative—romanticizing institutions that produced repression and scarcity—is too high a price to pay. We can win this argument if we stop whispering and start teaching, living, and campaigning for the truth.
At stake is more than policy. It’s the civic temperament of a generation. If half of our young people admire systems that crushed independence, then conservatives must act with urgency, clarity, and courage to restore common sense and safeguard liberty.
n
h/t: LifeSite News
n
Darnell Thompkins is a Canadian-born American and conservative opinion writer who brings a unique perspective to political and cultural discussions. Passionate about traditional values and individual freedoms, Darnell’s commentary reflects his commitment to fostering meaningful dialogue. When he’s not writing, he enjoys watching hockey and celebrating the sport that connects his Canadian roots with his American journey.