Bombshell Report Appears To Prove Covid19 Is A Chinese Bioweapon

Follow America's fastest-growing news aggregator, Spreely News, and stay informed. You can find all of our articles plus information from your favorite Conservative voices. 

A new bombshell study is making the claim that there is proof that Chinese scientists manufactured the COVID-19 virus in a lab and then tried to reverse-engineer new versions of the virus in order to fool the world into thinking it evolved naturally from bats. If that is true then that is one of the most diabolical crimes of the millennia.

The Daily Mail reported on Saturday that British professor Angus Dalgleish and Norwegian scientist Dr. Birger Sorensen wrote that they have held primary evidence “of retro-engineering in China” since last year, but were ignored by academics and major medical journals and the outlet noted that the study will soon be published.

The study establishes: “the likelihood of it being the result of natural processes is very small.” The virus they manufactured is still killing 12,000 people around the globe every day.

Dalgleish, a London oncology professor, is known for his work on a vaccine for HIV. Sorensen is a virologist and chairman of Immunor, a pharmaceutical company that developed a coronavirus vaccine candidate called Biovacc-19. Dalgleish also has a financial stake in that company.

While the pair said that while they were doing research on COVID-19, they came across “unique fingerprints” suggesting that the virus never came from nature. They said the giveaway was when they found a rare instance in the COVID-carrying virus of a row of amino acids giving off a positive charge and bond to negative human cells. That was a huge tell to the two scientists.

“The laws of physics mean that you cannot have four positively charged amino acids in a row,” Dalgleish told the news outlet. “The only way you can get this is if you artificially manufacture it.” BOOM!

They did their homework too by tracking Chinese research that was published, some of it done with American universities, that explained how the tools they used to create the virus were built. DOUBLE BOOM!

A large part of the work that was reviewed surrounded “gain of function” research. Gain of function consists of manipulating natural viruses inside a lab with the intention of making them more infectious to humans so that scientists can then study the potential effect on human beings. That kind of work should be considered morbid and illegal. Think about every mad scientist movie you ever watched. Apparently that’s what happened at the Wuhan lab.

To his credit, President Barack Obama put a moratorium on that kind of research back in 2014. He knew just how dangerous that kind of work was and he wanted no part of it, so he told Dr. Fauci to shut it down. Last week, Fauci testified before Congress saying that it’s impossible to know if $600,000 in medical research funding we gave to the Chinese at Wuhan was used for gain of function research.

“A natural virus pandemic would be expected to mutate gradually and become more infectious but less pathogenic, which is what many expected with the COVID-19 pandemic but which does not appear to have happened,” the two scientists wrote.

News of their research was made possible due to renewed interest in the COVID-19 virus’ origins, which the Chinese originally told the world came from bats sold at a wet market in China.

Had the tech tyrants from social media sites like Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, and others not censored the hell out of anyone who questioned the origin of the COVID-19 virus, we might have learned about their research a long time ago. Lives could have been saved, but it was more important for Democrats to block any information that might lead to President Donald Trump being right about the virus originating in China. This begs the question why did the Democrats and the Left vehemently argue that saying the virus came from China was racist? We have all throughout history named viruses from where they originated, like the Spanish Flu and Lyme Disease. So why were the Democrats so hell-bent against that? Did they know and wanted to cover it up? What other reason could they have had for their behavior?

Share:

GET MORE STORIES LIKE THIS

IN YOUR INBOX!

Sign up for our daily email and get the stories everyone is talking about.

Advertisement

Trending

Discover more from Liberty One News

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading