![Taylor Swift Criticizes Subpoena in Blake Lively’s Intense Courtroom Battle [WATCH]](https://i0.wp.com/libertyonenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/2025.04.25-10.47-boredtrashpanda-680b6835a831f.jpg?fit=1920%2C1080&ssl=1)
Blake Lively has found herself in the middle of a legal whirlwind, and it’s got everyone talking. She’s pulled conservative commentator Candace Owens and blogger Perez Hilton into her ongoing legal battle with director Justin Baldoni. The revelation came from Page Six, which reported that Lively has accused Owens and Hilton of teaming up with Baldoni to tarnish her reputation through their online platforms.
Lively, who you might know from her upcoming film “It Ends With Us,” is locked in a lawsuit with Baldoni, a former co-star. She claims that Owens and Hilton have been part of a smear campaign against her. TMZ was among the first to break the news of these subpoenas.
Candace Owens, who is known for her unfiltered opinions, addressed the situation on her YouTube channel. She mentioned she hadn’t been officially served any legal papers and only learned about the subpoenas through TMZ. Owens called the legal move a “hit,” suggesting that it was an attempt to suppress factual responses.
Owens was quick to deny any financial ties to Baldoni, asserting her independence. She emphasized that she speaks her mind freely, without being influenced by external forces. “I don’t dance for money,” she boldly stated, making it clear she is not easily swayed.
Perez Hilton also took to social media to express his surprise at the subpoena. He revealed it was the first he’d heard of the legal development. Hilton, like Owens, stated he had not been served any legal documents and hadn’t even had a chance to discuss it with his lawyer, Bryan Freedman.
Freedman, interestingly, also represents Baldoni, adding another layer of complexity to this legal saga. He previously accused Lively of leveraging her friendship with pop star Taylor Swift in the case. Lively had tried to prevent a subpoena aimed at Swift earlier in the year.
Baldoni initially sought access to Swift’s communications but later dropped that subpoena. It was reported that Scott Swift, Taylor’s father, voluntarily provided some information, including texts and alleged threats from Lively. This back-and-forth adds to the drama surrounding the legal proceedings.
The lawsuit’s roots go deeper, as Lively has accused Baldoni of sexual harassment, among other charges. Baldoni had fired back with a countersuit for defamation and extortion, but that case has since been dismissed. Despite these legal maneuvers, the court has allowed Baldoni to access private messages between Swift and Lively.
The trial is set for March 2026, and until then, the legal and media battles are likely to continue. Representatives for Baldoni have remained tight-lipped about the subpoenas, adding to the intrigue. As the clock ticks toward the trial date, all parties are likely preparing for a contentious courtroom showdown.
The involvement of high-profile figures like Owens and Hilton has drawn significant media attention. Lively’s legal team appears determined to pursue these subpoenas, despite the pushback. The situation highlights the complex interplay between celebrity, media, and the law.
Owens and Hilton, both known for their outspoken personalities, now find themselves entangled in a legal dispute that shows no signs of cooling down. It’s a classic case of Hollywood drama spilling over into real-world legal consequences. As the legal fight unfolds, observers are keenly watching to see how it will impact those involved.
Lively, Baldoni, Owens, and Hilton are all navigating the challenges of public perception and legal strategy. With such high stakes, every move is being scrutinized by fans and critics alike. This legal battle is a testament to the relentless scrutiny faced by public figures.
While the legal teams prepare for the upcoming trial, the media continues to speculate on the possible outcomes. Each new development adds to the narrative, keeping the public engaged. The stakes are high, and the resolution of this case could have lasting implications for all involved.
As March 2026 approaches, the anticipation builds around this high-profile trial. The legal drama serves as a reminder of the complexities faced by those in the public eye. With the spotlight firmly on Lively and her co-defendants, the outcome remains uncertain, but undoubtedly significant.
