A new lawsuit has emerged, alleging that Palestinian-American billionaire Bashar Masri played a role in facilitating the October 7 attacks by Hamas. The plaintiffs, who are families of American victims, claim that Masri utilized his Gaza-based companies to assist in constructing vital infrastructure for Hamas. This includes tunnels and buildings used for high-level meetings, some of which were allegedly funded by U.S. taxpayer money through the United States Agency for International Development (USAID).
The lawsuit asserts that Masri’s collaboration with Hamas directly contributed to the tragic events of October 7. Families affected by the attack have brought this action under the Anti-Terrorism Act, highlighting the serious nature of the allegations. Despite these claims, Masri has denied any wrongdoing, with his office stating they were shocked by the lawsuit’s baseless accusations.
Court filings name several of Masri’s companies as defendants, including the Palestine Development & Investment Company. The suit accuses Masri of using Massar International Ltd to obtain U.S. tax dollars for his enterprises. Efforts to reach Massar International for comment were unsuccessful.
Masri is well-connected, with ties to influential circles in Washington, D.C., and beyond. He serves on the Dean’s Council at Harvard University’s Kennedy School of Government and collaborates with wealthy investors through the Middle East Investment Institute. The lawsuit raises questions about whether USAID funds were funneled to his companies, but this remains unconfirmed.
The Gaza Industrial Estate, described as a significant asset in Masri’s portfolio, allegedly housed Hamas tunnels beneath its surface. The lawsuit claims that the estate diverted solar power to support terrorist activities, with construction financed by USAID and the World Bank’s International Finance Corporation. In addition to infrastructure, Masri’s luxury hotels in Gaza allegedly hosted Hamas leaders.
Court documents mention that these hotels served as venues for both public and private Hamas events. They also reportedly provided a haven for Hamas officials to enjoy luxurious amenities unavailable to most Gazans. The complaint specifically names Yahya Sinwar, the alleged mastermind of the October 7 attacks, as a frequent visitor.
Sinwar, a former Hamas leader, was killed by the Israeli Defense Force on October 17, 2024. He is accused of orchestrating the attacks with the intent to leverage Palestinian casualties against Israel. The surprise attack on October 7 resulted in the deaths of nearly 1,200 people in Israel and the capture of 240 hostages.
The lawsuit describes Masri as using his legitimate business operations to mask his alleged support for Hamas. It argues that this deception had severe consequences, as evidenced by the October 7 tragedy. The legal action seeks accountability for the American victims and their families.
Despite the serious charges, Masri’s office maintains that neither he nor his companies have engaged in unlawful activities. They dismiss the allegations as false and unfounded, underscoring the complexity of the case. The State Department, overseeing USAID, has not commented on the situation.
The case highlights the challenges in tracing international aid and its potential misuse. It also brings to light the intricate connections between business, politics, and conflict in the region. The lawsuit may set a precedent for how such allegations are handled in the future.
As the legal battle unfolds, the focus remains on establishing the facts and holding accountable those responsible for the attack. The plaintiffs are determined to seek justice for their loved ones through the legal system. This case serves as a reminder of the ongoing tensions and the human cost of geopolitical conflicts.
The allegations against Masri have sparked discussions about the oversight of international aid. Questions are being raised about how funds meant for development can be diverted for nefarious purposes. This lawsuit could prompt a closer examination of such financial flows.
While Masri denies any involvement, the case underscores the importance of transparency and accountability in international dealings. The outcome may have implications for future aid policies and partnerships. The situation remains a complex web of allegations, denials, and legal proceedings.
As the situation develops, the world watches closely, considering the broader implications for peace and security in the region. The case exemplifies the intersection of wealth, power, and conflict in the Middle East. For now, the focus remains on uncovering the truth and delivering justice.
