Abdul El-Sayed’s record running Detroit’s Health Department and overseeing the city’s animal-control unit is back in the spotlight as Michigan voters weigh his Senate bid. This piece walks through the allegations, the numbers, the whistleblower claims, the legal fallout and the campaign’s defense so readers can judge what accountability looks like.
When El-Sayed took responsibility for Detroit Animal Care and Control, the operation he inherited had an alarmingly low live-release rate. Records and local reports say the shelter’s save rate hovered around the low 20s before changes were made, and that reality is central to why critics say his tenure deserves scrutiny.
A former animal-control officer filed a whistleblower suit alleging horrific conditions and mistreatment inside the shelter, and those accusations did not just whisper around city hall. The complaint said animals were deprived of food and care, kept in filthy spaces and neglected until they died, and the public reaction was swift and harsh.
“I actually really really don’t want to believe this. Can someone verify?” asked Michael LaRosa, voicing the shock many felt at the allegations. The candidate’s Republican rival seized on that outrage, posting on X, “This is sickening. Abdul El-Sayed wants Michiganders to trust him with their families,” and, “Meanwhile, Detroiters couldn’t even trust him with their pets.”
Brittany Roberts, the whistleblower, put the claims bluntly on the record, saying, “I was almost embarrassed with myself to be part of a team that played a role of the death of so many dogs in their cages.” She added, “Every morning, we’d just walk around and see who was alive before we could even feed.” Her language painted a picture of a shelter in chaos.
Roberts also described the facility as a “slaughterhouse,” testimony that drove legal and public pressure on city officials. She alleged retaliation after reporting problems, a charge that led to a settlement and left voters wondering how much oversight was in place at the time.
City numbers and outside groups reported large-scale euthanasia in 2015, with nearly 2,300 animals listed as put down in one set of tallying. Officials countered that the unit moved through a difficult transition, that budget constraints and broken facilities played a role, and that the city took steps to change policies and partner with rescues to boost placements.
El-Sayed himself acknowledged the mess and credited a new director with turning things around, saying, “When I was the new director of the Detroit Health Department, I inherited a part of the job that I never trained for and never thought I would do, which is Detroit Animal Control,” and, “And it was a mess at the time, and I needed somebody who I could trust, who could come in and do right by the animals and right by the people of the city of Detroit. And Mel Miller was that person.”
The numbers improved after management changes, with local reporting showing the live-release rate rising into the 60s by late 2016. Still, the critics point to the raw counts of animals euthanized during the broader period and the legal challenges that continued while El-Sayed was in charge.
A federal judge limited the agency’s power to seize dogs without clear cause amid residents’ complaints that pets went missing or died after city custody. The city later settled the whistleblower suit for $63,000, a sign that the legal system found enough merit in the claims to avoid protracted litigation.
The campaign counters that El-Sayed inherited a failing system, boosted pay for frontline staff, upgraded facilities, rewrote care protocols and expanded partnerships to get more animals out alive. Voters now face a choice: accept the narrative of a messy inheritance corrected under his watch or hold him accountable for the suffering that occurred while the shelter was under his department.
Graduate Student, wife, engaged political and legal writer.